|

Variety,
February
18, 1931
Dracula (1931)
Universal production
and release. Directed by Tod Browning. Bela Lugosi creator of stage
role, heads cast; no star. From the novel by Bram Stoker and stage
play by Deane and John Balderston. Screen version by Garrett Fort.
Photography by Karl Freund. Running time, 64 minutes. At Roxy, New
York, week Feb. 11.
| Count
Dracula |
Bela Lugosi |
 |
| Mina
Seward |
Helen Chandler |
| John
Harker |
David Manners |
| Renfield |
Dwight
Frye |
| Dr.
Van Helsing |
Edward
Van Sloan |
| Dr.
Seward |
Herbert
Bunston |
| Lucy
Weston |
Frances
Dade |
| Martin |
Charles
Gerrard |
| Briggs |
John Standing |
| Maid |
Moon Carroll |
| English
Nurse |
Josephine
Velez |
Here was a picture
whose screen fortunes must have caused much uncertainty as to the
femme fan reaction. As it turns out all the signs are that the woman
angle is favorable and that sets the picture for better than average
money at the box office.
Treatment differs
from both the stage version and the original novel. On the stage
it was a thriller carried to such an extreme that it had a comedy
punch by its very outré aspect. On the screen it comes out
as a sublimated ghost story related with all surface seriousness
and above all with a remarkably effective background of creepy atmosphere.
So that its kick is the real emotional horror kick, presented to
be enjoyed from the security of an orchestra chair.
Such a treatment
called for the utmost delicacy of handling, because the thing is
so completely ultra-sensational on its serious side that the faintest
excess of telling would make it grotesque. Nice judgement here gets
the maximum of shivers without ever destroying the screen illusion,
the element that makes it possible is the pictorial plausibility
of the scenes of horror in which impossible creatures move. That
is, the mute perfection of the settings carries the conviction that
the characters lack.
Early in the
action is the setting of a barren rocky mountain pass, peopled only
by a spectral coach driver and shrouded in a miasmic mist, eloquent
of dark deeds and terrifying horrors. Story proceeds thence into
a tomb-like castle, which is the climax of charnal (sic) house locale.
In such surroundings the sinister figure of the human vampire, the
living-dead Count Dracula who sustains life by drinking the blood
of his victims, seems almost plausible. The atmosphere makes anything
seem possible.
Through
the same significance of settings is craftily nursed until the audience
sits back in a state of expectancy, anticipating the next stimulating
shiver. And not without reason, for some of the horror tricks of
sound and sight are full powered. There is the spectral hand reaching
out from the slightly raised lid of a coffin; a coffin that disgorges
rat-like creatures; there is the ominous flapping of ghostly wings
as ghoulish bats circle about and the scuttling of spiders on cobwebs;
a madman who shrieks in demoniacal rage for spiders to eat, and
the stealthy creeping of the human vampire upon his sleeping victim.
Story is cunningly
developed like the fireside ghost tale, and with just the right
twist that it couldnt possibly happen to give it the true
flavor. It took the resources of the studio to tell the story right.
It was beyond the stage, although the novel is said to have gin
something of a similar punch.
Picture has
a fragment of a prolog which turns it all off trimly for the desired
effect of a cheerful play on horrors that can be enjoyed in comfort
(a technique that is the essence of high comedy). After the capping
shiver of the scientist laying the vampire ghost by finding his
daytime grave and driving a stake through the heart of the corpse,
to the accompaniment of blood-curdling moans, a conferencier appears
upon the screen with a brief address. His remarks are to the effect
that if what had happened on the screen comes up to disturb your
mind when you get home, dont worry, because such things as
the screen showed are possible after all gentle jest that
gives the elaborate horror just the right light touch.
It is difficult
to think of anybody who could quite match the performance in the
vampire part of Bela Lugosi, even to the faint flavor of foreign
speech that fits so neatly. Helen Chandler is the blonde type for
the clinging vine heroine, and Herbert Bunston played the scientist
deadly straight, but with a faint suggestion of comedy that dovetails
into the whole pattern.
The scientist,
as a matter of record, in the picture with his graphic details of
vampirish traits and antidotes almost turns the implausible into
the plausible, even while you appreciate all of its implausibility.
In this, alone, the higher intellect theatergoer will be also interested.
copyright
© 1931 Variety
|